I am quite happy to see the efforts being done here. It is so important to assert Sovereignty over systems that Parasitize those who were supposed to have had Representation.
One of the biggest issues I have been trying to tackle is helping people realize that they are Individually Sovereign, there are some people who may disagree, but ultimately Representation is a maxim of a Voluntarily Cooperative and Decentralized method living and interacting.
An important quote that I think everyone should consider:
"The truth is -- one who seeks to achieve freedom by "Petitioning" those in power to give it to him has already failed, regardless of the response. To "Beg" for the Blessing of "Authority" is to accept that the choice is the Master's alone to make, which means that the person is already, by definition, a Slave." -- Quote from Larken Rose
Here are some posts on Individualized Sovereignty:
Severing Our Ties to the System we always Thought we Knew:
Self Reliance is revolutionary in a world dominated by Conformity, a dangerous form of Liberty is True Freedom. We must sacrifice things we think we are, so that we can embrace what we truly are.
Each Individual is born Sovereign, then a toe tag called "Citizenship" is attached to reduce the true power of that Sovereignty, because that which becomes "Defined" falls under the Jurisdiction of those who create the definition.
The quality of State and Local Governance would be greatly improved if there could be a re introduction of the personal status known as "Sui Juris," in addition to re asserting state level Sovereignty.
If one has the power to grant freedom to another, they would also have the power to take it away, meaning all you had was not freedom at all, what you had was permission.
What you are doing in Tennessee, the Nullification and State Sovereignty is extremely important, I will be recommending your Sub Stack on my own and manually on posts.
If your efforts are successful it with send shivers to Globalist and their Infiltrators in DC.
I'm in California unfortunately, so there's no hope for something so wonderful to happen here. Soon, I'll be a California expat in Tennessee.
We welcome all patriots to Tennessee. Our legislative session starts next week so the more names we have as subscribers the better it helps us. Our legislators need to know people want this law passed. Getting the silver/gold as legal tender and a precious metals depository will probably pass easily but HB0726 Restoring State Sovereignty Through Nullification is a different story. We are going to need massive pressure even hear in the very red state of TN.
Yes. Sui Juris (having full legal capacity to act on one's own behalf : not subject to the authority of another) was first introduced in 1590. It is part of stated jurisdiction under Roman and British authority. The designation was incorporated into "law" very early in the American revolution. Refer to bold title: "The History" >>> https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/#top
You will need to jump through the silly ass CAPTCHA thingy... Well worth the read...
Thank you for this extraordinary effort toward resolving Federal overreach. The infringement of civil liberties and States rights via Supreme court decision, must be addressed. >>> How the Supreme Court justified it’s own existence, and subverted the intent of States Confederacies and individual civil sovereignty. > John Jay’s Opinion, Chisolm v. Georgia, [18 February 1793]
Regarding the supreme court, this is submitted for informational purposes only in the hope that folks may have an idea of what they're up against in relying on "protections" from a very flawed document and system in case they may not already be aware.
The “antit-federalist,” “Montezuma,” wrote this a part of a hysterical and satirical expose of the plans of the consolidators. The whole thing was as accurate as it was prescient.
“But again gentlemen, our judicial power is a strong work, a masked battery, few people see the guns we can and will ere long play off from it. For the judicial power embraces every question which can arise in law or equity, under this constitution and under the laws of “the United States” (which laws will be, you know, the supreme laws of the land).
-Montezuma (pen name), "A Consolidated Government is a Tyranny"
“MONTEZUMA,” regarded as a Pennsylvanian, wrote this essay which showed up in the Independent Gazetteer on October 17, 1787.
Hello Goeff: Excellent find! The piece expresses the deep skepticism of persons who distrusted consolidation of the American Confederacy toward a Federalized Republic. The continuance of British, French, and Dutch rules of commerce, sank the ship of State before it even left the harbor. None of this is taught in our 'socialized' schools... Thanks for posting.
Hello Geoff: Yup. Complete with 13 stripes. Added to my collection of red, white, and blue colored flags. There are numerous red-white-blue tricolor flags. As luck (and maritime commerce) would have it, the original tricolor dates back to 1572, and was the official flag of the Netherlands...
"There are numerous red-white-blue tricolor flags."
I've noticed that as well. It's a coincidence for sure ! ; )
Regarding the Netherlands, I wonder how many Ameircans realize that the Am Rev was financed partly by loans from them, and that a huge motivation for the consititution was the supposed "need" to keep the country's credit intact. I think there's a story in there somewhere! ; )
Our session starts next week and ends mid to late April. The WHA meets in May. And there is also a waiting period before any of it goes into affect. Our legislation will be passed before the WHA meets. That is why it is imperative it gets passed during this legislative session. If the people get engaged we can make it happen. Then we tell the feds and the WHO/WEF/UN to pounce sand. Other states better get on board too
HB0726 NULLIFICATION ACT...To every America loving American...share this far and wide, on every platform...make this red wave grow into the Tsunami that wipes out every unconstitutional fed law. Like the Thomas Paine "Common Sense" Affect...whereby Americans united to fight tyranny and won...let this bill excite and ignite an unstoppable wildfire for the love of God and Country. Let this bill raise hope for the hopeless. Let this bill empower those that feel powerless. Let this bill awaken the sleep walkers. Let this bill unite the lions. Let this bill bring light to the darkness. Let this bill put the fear of the people back into govt.This is the way to peacefully, legally, and constitutionally save America...from sea to shining sea, and with the Grace of God, prove to all people...America is a beacon of hope, America can beat corruption, America is strong, America is united, Americans are brave, America is and always will be Greatest Nation in the World. God bless and God speed.
I have sent Sen. Ward an email concerning HB0726 and will most likely Prin the Bill and Give it to her. if you have any names I could attach to it would be a great help.
Representative Bud Hulsey and Senator Janice Bowling from TN are the sponsors of the legislation. Rep. Bud Hulsey is who I would recommend Sen. Ward speak with.
"It was the intent of our founders to extremely limit the power of the federal government ..."
Why do folks keep claiming that? Where is the proof?
"...but over time they have exceeded their authority..."
This was predicted by the so called anti-federalists. In fact, the "founders" exceeded their authority by establishing a centralized authority. The people involved were supposed to limit themselves to amending the Articles of Confederation but instead, took it upon themselves and imposed their plans on the rest of us. Of course they made up pretexts to get the thing ratified.
“The Constitution looked fairly good on paper, but it was not a popular document; people were suspicious of it, and suspicious of the enabling legislation that was being erected upon it. There was some ground for this. The Constitution had been laid down under unacceptable auspices; its history had been that of a coup d'état.
“It had been drafted, in the first place, by men representing special economic interests. Four-fifths of them were public creditors, one-third were land speculators, and one-fifth represented interests in shipping, manufacturing, and merchandising. Most of them were lawyers. Not one of them represented the interest of production — Vilescit origine tali. (the dice were loaded from the start)
Albert Jay Nock, Liberty vs. the Constitution: The Early Struggle
Art. 1 Sec. 8 lays out the powers of the federal government and anything other than those 18 powers belong to the states. They use the Supremacy Clause, General Welfare Clause, Commerce Clause to extend their authority and the ignorant American people have allowed them to twist the truth. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that extends federal authority beyond those 18 powers. NOTHING. You can also check out Art. 1 Sec. 9 and 10. No the Constitution was not a popular document that is why we added the Bill of Rights. The Constitution in its original form was a good document if men were not so corrupt and evil. And the American people so complacent. I can only try. I truly believe this is our last and only peaceful option left. Thanks for you comment. I truly appreciate the time you took to write and for the link from Mises.
Necessary and Proper? This clause ultimately infringed upon free and open trade, and granted Congress the power to regulate both interstate and 'foreign' commerce. Maritime rule incrementally replaced Common Law jurisprudence, which supplanted the intended sovereignty of States...
For readers unapprised of Enumerated Powers defined within the Constitution. >>>
Thanks very much. There are no clauses in the Constitution that expands the 18 powers in Art. 1 Sec. 8. They like to use the Supremacy Clause, Necessary and Proper, General Welfare Clause, Commerce Clause to expand their authority but none of those clauses or anything else in the Constitution expands their authority. Just because they say so doesn't make it so.
Hi Karen. You nailed it right here: "Just because they say so doesn't make it so." Yes. Exactly. There were valid reasons behind the objectives of the original 13th Amendment. The 'legal' classes mostly consist of frauds and con artists. Alas...
Who would have ever guessed the world would be in the mess it currently is experiencing. If we cannot fight back at the state level at this point we are truly out of peaceful solutions.
I am quite happy to see the efforts being done here. It is so important to assert Sovereignty over systems that Parasitize those who were supposed to have had Representation.
One of the biggest issues I have been trying to tackle is helping people realize that they are Individually Sovereign, there are some people who may disagree, but ultimately Representation is a maxim of a Voluntarily Cooperative and Decentralized method living and interacting.
An important quote that I think everyone should consider:
"The truth is -- one who seeks to achieve freedom by "Petitioning" those in power to give it to him has already failed, regardless of the response. To "Beg" for the Blessing of "Authority" is to accept that the choice is the Master's alone to make, which means that the person is already, by definition, a Slave." -- Quote from Larken Rose
Here are some posts on Individualized Sovereignty:
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/individualized-sovereignty-and-political
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/severing-our-political-ties-and-finding
Severing Our Ties to the System we always Thought we Knew:
Self Reliance is revolutionary in a world dominated by Conformity, a dangerous form of Liberty is True Freedom. We must sacrifice things we think we are, so that we can embrace what we truly are.
Each Individual is born Sovereign, then a toe tag called "Citizenship" is attached to reduce the true power of that Sovereignty, because that which becomes "Defined" falls under the Jurisdiction of those who create the definition.
The quality of State and Local Governance would be greatly improved if there could be a re introduction of the personal status known as "Sui Juris," in addition to re asserting state level Sovereignty.
If one has the power to grant freedom to another, they would also have the power to take it away, meaning all you had was not freedom at all, what you had was permission.
Exactly, those who are actually free don't ask for permission; they claim it.
These days, it's like most people have been anesthetized into accepting a master.
The legal system is not lawful, it's fiction. No system can function without the consent of those who are supposed to participate in it.
t.co/M8xeWGZkbB
This link is obviously spam.
What you are doing in Tennessee, the Nullification and State Sovereignty is extremely important, I will be recommending your Sub Stack on my own and manually on posts.
If your efforts are successful it with send shivers to Globalist and their Infiltrators in DC.
I'm in California unfortunately, so there's no hope for something so wonderful to happen here. Soon, I'll be a California expat in Tennessee.
We welcome all patriots to Tennessee. Our legislative session starts next week so the more names we have as subscribers the better it helps us. Our legislators need to know people want this law passed. Getting the silver/gold as legal tender and a precious metals depository will probably pass easily but HB0726 Restoring State Sovereignty Through Nullification is a different story. We are going to need massive pressure even hear in the very red state of TN.
I'll do what I can.
You will be welcomed.
Yes. Sui Juris (having full legal capacity to act on one's own behalf : not subject to the authority of another) was first introduced in 1590. It is part of stated jurisdiction under Roman and British authority. The designation was incorporated into "law" very early in the American revolution. Refer to bold title: "The History" >>> https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/#top
You will need to jump through the silly ass CAPTCHA thingy... Well worth the read...
I'm glad I found a link to your site.
I am glad you did too. Thanks for joining.
Thank you for this extraordinary effort toward resolving Federal overreach. The infringement of civil liberties and States rights via Supreme court decision, must be addressed. >>> How the Supreme Court justified it’s own existence, and subverted the intent of States Confederacies and individual civil sovereignty. > John Jay’s Opinion, Chisolm v. Georgia, [18 February 1793]
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jay/01-05-02-0251
Thank you for the comment and link
Regarding the supreme court, this is submitted for informational purposes only in the hope that folks may have an idea of what they're up against in relying on "protections" from a very flawed document and system in case they may not already be aware.
The “antit-federalist,” “Montezuma,” wrote this a part of a hysterical and satirical expose of the plans of the consolidators. The whole thing was as accurate as it was prescient.
“But again gentlemen, our judicial power is a strong work, a masked battery, few people see the guns we can and will ere long play off from it. For the judicial power embraces every question which can arise in law or equity, under this constitution and under the laws of “the United States” (which laws will be, you know, the supreme laws of the land).
-Montezuma (pen name), "A Consolidated Government is a Tyranny"
“MONTEZUMA,” regarded as a Pennsylvanian, wrote this essay which showed up in the Independent Gazetteer on October 17, 1787.
https://thefederalistpapers.org/antifederalist-paper-9/
Hello Goeff: Excellent find! The piece expresses the deep skepticism of persons who distrusted consolidation of the American Confederacy toward a Federalized Republic. The continuance of British, French, and Dutch rules of commerce, sank the ship of State before it even left the harbor. None of this is taught in our 'socialized' schools... Thanks for posting.
"The continuance of British, French, and Dutch rules of commerce, sank the ship of State before it even left the harbor."
Yup, and the Rev was co-opted right out of the box.
Speaking of commerce, have you seen a representation of the flag of the British East India Company? Betsy Ross my toosh! : )
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c0/Flag_of_the_British_East_India_Company_%281801%29.svg/1200px-Flag_of_the_British_East_India_Company_%281801%29.svg.png
Hello Geoff: Yup. Complete with 13 stripes. Added to my collection of red, white, and blue colored flags. There are numerous red-white-blue tricolor flags. As luck (and maritime commerce) would have it, the original tricolor dates back to 1572, and was the official flag of the Netherlands...
"There are numerous red-white-blue tricolor flags."
I've noticed that as well. It's a coincidence for sure ! ; )
Regarding the Netherlands, I wonder how many Ameircans realize that the Am Rev was financed partly by loans from them, and that a huge motivation for the consititution was the supposed "need" to keep the country's credit intact. I think there's a story in there somewhere! ; )
Thank you for your important work!
I am forwarding this article to my 450+ Truth/Great Awakening email recipients. Probably send it tomorrow.
Thanks so much Keith. I truly appreciate the help.
Better hurry up folks...
The WHO /WEF / UN is Waaay ahead of ya'll...
Our session starts next week and ends mid to late April. The WHA meets in May. And there is also a waiting period before any of it goes into affect. Our legislation will be passed before the WHA meets. That is why it is imperative it gets passed during this legislative session. If the people get engaged we can make it happen. Then we tell the feds and the WHO/WEF/UN to pounce sand. Other states better get on board too
Great work, Karen! Warrior blood runs deep in you, and hopefully, in all Tennesseans.
Thank you. We will see if Tennesseans have what it takes in a few months. I believe we do.
Go Tennessee. Cross posted.
Other states should do this too.
I've Been Everywhere: Johnny Cash
https://youtu.be/mNj6spCtUE0?si=1n-KV50nFml4D7tz
(not endorsing youtube or any ads)
Thanks much!!!
Hi Karen, Why is it not allowing me to cross post?
I have no idea. Very strange.
Now it is allowing me to.
Strange. Glad whatever it was is cleared up.
Thank you for organizing and taking action. I’m spreading the word to get more people to sign up.
Thank you very much.
HB0726 NULLIFICATION ACT...To every America loving American...share this far and wide, on every platform...make this red wave grow into the Tsunami that wipes out every unconstitutional fed law. Like the Thomas Paine "Common Sense" Affect...whereby Americans united to fight tyranny and won...let this bill excite and ignite an unstoppable wildfire for the love of God and Country. Let this bill raise hope for the hopeless. Let this bill empower those that feel powerless. Let this bill awaken the sleep walkers. Let this bill unite the lions. Let this bill bring light to the darkness. Let this bill put the fear of the people back into govt.This is the way to peacefully, legally, and constitutionally save America...from sea to shining sea, and with the Grace of God, prove to all people...America is a beacon of hope, America can beat corruption, America is strong, America is united, Americans are brave, America is and always will be Greatest Nation in the World. God bless and God speed.
Thank you. People can get a copy of the HB0726 on our website under the TN LEGISLATION tab on our website. tncss.weebly.com
I have sent Sen. Ward an email concerning HB0726 and will most likely Prin the Bill and Give it to her. if you have any names I could attach to it would be a great help.
Thanks
Representative Bud Hulsey and Senator Janice Bowling from TN are the sponsors of the legislation. Rep. Bud Hulsey is who I would recommend Sen. Ward speak with.
"It was the intent of our founders to extremely limit the power of the federal government ..."
Why do folks keep claiming that? Where is the proof?
"...but over time they have exceeded their authority..."
This was predicted by the so called anti-federalists. In fact, the "founders" exceeded their authority by establishing a centralized authority. The people involved were supposed to limit themselves to amending the Articles of Confederation but instead, took it upon themselves and imposed their plans on the rest of us. Of course they made up pretexts to get the thing ratified.
“The Constitution looked fairly good on paper, but it was not a popular document; people were suspicious of it, and suspicious of the enabling legislation that was being erected upon it. There was some ground for this. The Constitution had been laid down under unacceptable auspices; its history had been that of a coup d'état.
“It had been drafted, in the first place, by men representing special economic interests. Four-fifths of them were public creditors, one-third were land speculators, and one-fifth represented interests in shipping, manufacturing, and merchandising. Most of them were lawyers. Not one of them represented the interest of production — Vilescit origine tali. (the dice were loaded from the start)
Albert Jay Nock, Liberty vs. the Constitution: The Early Struggle
https://mises.org/library/liberty-vs-constitution-early-struggle
Now, that being said, I nevertheless admire what you're attempting. Godspeed!
Art. 1 Sec. 8 lays out the powers of the federal government and anything other than those 18 powers belong to the states. They use the Supremacy Clause, General Welfare Clause, Commerce Clause to extend their authority and the ignorant American people have allowed them to twist the truth. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that extends federal authority beyond those 18 powers. NOTHING. You can also check out Art. 1 Sec. 9 and 10. No the Constitution was not a popular document that is why we added the Bill of Rights. The Constitution in its original form was a good document if men were not so corrupt and evil. And the American people so complacent. I can only try. I truly believe this is our last and only peaceful option left. Thanks for you comment. I truly appreciate the time you took to write and for the link from Mises.
Thank you once again Karen Bracken. You are correct. In my opinion, the Enumerated Powers became corrupted specifically due to this section: Article I, Section 8, Clause 18: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C18-4/ALDE_00001239/
Necessary and Proper? This clause ultimately infringed upon free and open trade, and granted Congress the power to regulate both interstate and 'foreign' commerce. Maritime rule incrementally replaced Common Law jurisprudence, which supplanted the intended sovereignty of States...
For readers unapprised of Enumerated Powers defined within the Constitution. >>>
Article I Legislative Branch >>> Section 8 Enumerated Powers >>> https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-8/
Thanks very much. There are no clauses in the Constitution that expands the 18 powers in Art. 1 Sec. 8. They like to use the Supremacy Clause, Necessary and Proper, General Welfare Clause, Commerce Clause to expand their authority but none of those clauses or anything else in the Constitution expands their authority. Just because they say so doesn't make it so.
Hi Karen. You nailed it right here: "Just because they say so doesn't make it so." Yes. Exactly. There were valid reasons behind the objectives of the original 13th Amendment. The 'legal' classes mostly consist of frauds and con artists. Alas...
Happy new year to you'se.
t.co/M8xeWGZkbB
Good idea...could have tried during my years in the Swedish Parliament, at least tried.....
Who would have ever guessed the world would be in the mess it currently is experiencing. If we cannot fight back at the state level at this point we are truly out of peaceful solutions.